Paper · 2009 · Chinese Horticulture Abstracts

Effects of Pre-harvest Calcium Treatment on Fruit Quality and Storage Property of Peach cv. 'Jhuang'

Xu Lin

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

With pre-harvest treatment of different calcium concentrations,the changes in physiology and quality attributes of peach fruits for processing during storage periods were investigated.The results showed that the calcium treatment with different concentration 30d before harvest decreased the respiration rate and ethylene production,inhibited PPO activity,and maintained fruit firmness and quality.The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness,delayed senescence during storage periods,reduced flesh browning and maintained the quality of peach fruits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium applied 30 days before harvest decreases peach respiration and ethylene production.

Treatment
calcium treatment with different concentration 30d before harveste0
Outcome
respiration rate and ethylene productione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the calcium treatment with different concentration 30d before harvest decreased the respiration rate and ethylene production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–332 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest calcium inhibits PPO activity.

Treatment
calcium treatment with different concentration 30d before harveste0
Gene
PPOe0
Outcome
PPO activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the calcium treatment with different concentration 30d before harvest decreased the respiration rate and ethylene production,inhibited PPO activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–355 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preharvest calcium maintains fruit firmness and quality.

Treatment
calcium treatment with different concentration 30d before harveste0
Outcome
fruit firmness and qualitye0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the calcium treatment with different concentration 30d before harvest decreased the respiration rate and ethylene production,inhibited PPO activity,and maintained fruit firmness and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.0% calcium nitrate significantly improves peach firmness.

Treatment
1.0%e0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
Ca(NO_3)_2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5% calcium nitrate significantly improves peach firmness.

Treatment
1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2e0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–516 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.0% calcium nitrate delays storage senescence.

Treatment
1.0%e0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
Ca(NO_3)_2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness,delayed senescence during storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5% calcium nitrate delays storage senescence.

Treatment
1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2e0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness,delayed senescence during storage periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–558 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.0% calcium nitrate reduces flesh browning.

Treatment
1.0%e0
Outcome
flesh browninge0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Ca(NO_3)_2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness,delayed senescence during storage periods,reduced flesh browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5% calcium nitrate reduces flesh browning.

Treatment
1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2e0
Outcome
flesh browninge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness,delayed senescence during storage periods,reduced flesh browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“peach fruits for processing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 115–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.0% calcium nitrate maintains peach quality and is among the best treatments.

Treatment
1.0%e0
Outcome
quality of peach fruitse0
Direction
maintainede0
Qualifier
Ca(NO_3)_2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness,delayed senescence during storage periods,reduced flesh browning and maintained the quality of peach fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 1.5% calcium nitrate maintains peach quality and is among the best treatments.

Treatment
1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2e0
Outcome
quality of peach fruitse0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The spraying of 1.0%and 1.5%Ca(NO_3)_2 is the best effective treatment which significantly improved the fruit firmness,delayed senescence during storage periods,reduced flesh browning and maintained the quality of peach fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–625 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium atom · disease · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.