Quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)

1. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults differ6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. 1-methylcyclopropenePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. calcium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. ascorbic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Cinnamomum verumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. carvacrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. hydrogen sulfideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. oxalic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. sodium silicateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. uvResults differ6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
17. storagePositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. nitrogenPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
20. lightPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. coldPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. in vitroPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. irrigationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. loss of functionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
29. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. radiationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. trap barrierResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
33. graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.