Quality: phytochemicals · Prunus persica (peach)

1. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. ascorbic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Cinnamomum verumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. carvacrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. hydrogen sulfideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. oxalic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. sodium silicateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. irrigationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. loss of functionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
15. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. radiationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. trap barrierResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. graftingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.