application · Yield · Rosa
10 claims from these papers.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 10
Effect of NAA on growth and flowering in rose cultivar Super Star · 2003
- positive
Management of Powdery Mildew in Rose Under Polyhouse Condition · 2006
- positive
Effect of pruning levels and bio-fertilizers on production of rose cut flower · 2010
- positive
Epidemiology and Management of Powdery Mildew of Red Rose Caused by Sphaerotheca Pannosa Var. Rosae · 2010
- positive
Effects of different organic and inorganic fertilizers in rose (Rosa cv.) · 2013
- positive
Effect of growth regulators and cow urine on rose (Rosa hybrida) cv. poison · 2014
- positive
- positive
Morphological and floral characters of rose as influenced by growing media and growth regulators · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.