application · Quality: general · Rosa
5 claims from these papers.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 5
- positive
Effect of Different Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on the Flower Yield of Roses · 2012
- positive
Effects of different organic and inorganic fertilizers in rose (Rosa cv.) · 2013
- positive
Biological control of powdery mildew and black spot diseases of rose · 2018
- positive
Pre-harvest silicon treatment improves quality of cut rose stems and maintains postharvest vase life · 2020
- positive
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.