herbicide · Nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)
19 claims from these papers.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 11
SEEDING METHODS, WEED MANAGEMENT AND MOISTURE REGIMES ON NUTRIENT UPTAKE BY GROUNDNUT · 1996
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Yield and nutrient uptake in rabi groundnut as influenced by different weed management practices · 2018
- positive
- positive
Weed Management under Phosphorus Enrichment in Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
Influence of different weed management practices on yield and nutrient dynamics in groundnut · 2024
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4
- no effect
- no effect
Paraquat Behavior as Influenced by 2, 4-DB in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and Selected Weeds1 · 1992
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.