Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined weed controls raised groundnut phosphorus uptake by 370%.

A claim from Influence of intercropping and weed control measures on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake by sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and their effect on succeeding maize (Zea mays.) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined weed controls raised groundnut phosphorus uptake by 370%.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
combined application of both weed control measurese0
Outcome
uptake of N and Pe0
Direction
highere0
Value
370%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of both weed control measures showed 30.5 and 46.0% higher uptake of N and P by sunflower and 222 and 370% by groundnut respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–739

Title

Influence of intercropping and weed control measures on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake by sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and their effect on succeeding maize (Zea mays.)

V.B. SlNGH N D GAJENDRA GlRl Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v46i1.3218

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-7dff0583d6a36b6b5714e90b4d945c3da3df03b69b037d13c7ddb5b3b6075c96 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

herbicide · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.