Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand weeding increased groundnut N, P, Ca and S uptake.

A claim from Effect of weed control and gypsum application on uptake of N,P, Ca and S by groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and weeds · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding increased groundnut N, P, Ca and S uptake.

Taxon
groundnutsArachis hypogaeae0
Material
ICGS 1e0
Treatment
hand weedinge0
Outcome
N, P, Ca and S uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
not weedede0
Setting
New Delhi, Indiae0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a field experiment during kharif 1992 and 1993 in New Delhi, India, groundnuts cv. ICGS 1 were given 1 hand weeding at 15 days after sowing (DAS) or 2 hand weedings, at 15 and 30 DAS or were not weeded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204
e1

“Weed dry weight and weed N and P uptake generally decreased with increasing weeding, while groundnut pod yield and N, P, Ca and S uptake increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–493

Title

Effect of weed control and gypsum application on uptake of N,P, Ca and S by groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) and weeds

M. Devekumar; Gajendra Giri 1999

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-888c19251d0a1118c0961f0be409c85f183315668043d7ba619c1d82d736921b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.