application · Physiology: photosynthesis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)
23 claims from these papers; 7 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
7 citations between these papers: 6 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 19
PP_(333)DELAYS SENESCENCE OF PEANUT LEAVES · 2001
- positive
The Effect Pp333 and 784-1 on Autumn Peanut Output · 2001
- positive
Effect of Foliar Spraying of Fertilizer on Yield of Peanut Crop · 2003
- positive
Influence of DA-6 on physiological and growth targets of peanut under drought stress · 2009
- positive
Effect of Foliage Spraying on Photosynthetic Indexes and Plant Hormones of Peanut at Blossom Stage · 2011
- positive
Regulation of Calcium on Peanut Photosynthesis Under Low Night Temperature Stress · 2013
- positive
Foliar applications for amelioration of iron deficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2018
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Regulating effect of spraying stage of ethephon on the formation of source-sink in peanut. · 2021
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
The effect of praseodymium chloride on the germination and growth of peanut Beihua12 · 2026
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.