Quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)

1. RhizobiumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. zinc atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. boron atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. iron atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. potassium nitrateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. sulfur atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. 146712Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. carbendazimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. mancozebResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. seed treatmentPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. inoculationPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. micronutrientPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. fertilizationResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. phosphorusResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. processingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.