seed treatment · Quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)

Positive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect2012201420162018202020222024
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 8

  1. Effect of biofertilizers and phosphorus on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicerarietinum L) · 2013

  2. Effect of seed priming with molybdenum on performance of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2014

  3. Studies on effect of polymer seed coating, nanoparticles and hydro priming on seedling characters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seed · 2017

  4. Effect of Concentration and Duration of Osmopriming on Germination and Vigor of Aged Seed of Chickpea · 2018

  5. Salicylic acid improves seed germination through modulating antioxidant enzymes under salt stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2021

  6. Identification of Resistant Genotypes and Integrated Management of Dry Root Rot of Chickpea · 2023

  7. Evaluation of Seed Priming on Growth of Chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.) · 2023

  8. Effect of nano zinc, iron and phosphorus on yield and seed quality parameters of the rabi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2025

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Effect of seed treatment on germination and vigour in chickpea · 2011

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

seed treatment on Cicer arietinum (chickpea) against other targets

seed treatment · quality: grain on other organisms