Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture and Food Science

Effect of nano zinc, iron and phosphorus on yield and seed quality parameters of the rabi chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

DD Thanekar; AV Shinde; PS Bhosale; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field investigation on “Growth and yield analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by nutrient management through nano fertilizer.” was carried out during Rabi season, 2020-2021 at post graduate institute research farm Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani. Research was undertaken to study of morphological, growth and yield attributing traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through nano fertilizer. Experiment design with the randomized block design with three replication and ten treatments. The nano Fe, Zn and P fertilizer were used with NPK. The yield attributing characters are pod number, test weight, yield per plant, yield per plot, yield per hector and seed recovery and seed quality parameters includes germination percent, seedling length, seedling weight, seed vigour index involve under the study. Among all ten treatments T8 and T10 treatments shows significant effect on the pod number, seed yield per plant and per plot other in seed quality parameters also shows significantly increase in germination, seedling length, seedling dry weight and seed vigour index of Rabi chickpea. The most increase in yield attributes and seed quality parameters was obtained by the seed coating and foliar application of nano Zn and Fe @ 62.5 ml/ha and 250 ml/ha. In conclusion, this study proved that 100% RDF , seed coating of nano Zn + Fe @ 62.5 ml/ha and foliar spray of nano Zn + Fe @ 250 ml/ha can increase in the plant yield in chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 and T10 significantly affected chickpea pod number and seed yield per plant and plot.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T8 and T10 treatmentse0
Outcome
pod number, seed yield per plant and per plote0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T8 and T10 treatments shows significant effect on the pod number, seed yield per plant and per plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T8 and T10 significantly increased chickpea germination, seedling length, dry weight and vigour index.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
T8 and T10 treatmentse1
Outcome
germination, seedling length, seedling dry weight and seed vigour indexe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increase in germination, seedling length, seedling dry weight and seed vigour index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1113 · show in text ↑
e1

“T8 and T10 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–893 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc and iron seed coating and foliar application gave the greatest increases in yield attributes and seed quality.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
seed coating and foliar application of nano Zn and Fe @ 62.5 ml/ha and 250 ml/hae0
Outcome
yield attributes and seed quality parameterse0
Direction
most increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most increase in yield attributes and seed quality parameters was obtained by the seed coating and foliar application of nano Zn and Fe @ 62.5 ml/ha and 250 ml/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that full recommended fertilizer plus nano zinc and iron coating and spray can increase chickpea yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
100% RDF , seed coating of nano Zn + Fe @ 62.5 ml/ha and foliar spray of nano Zn + Fe @ 250 ml/ha can increase in the plant yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF , seed coating of nano Zn + Fe @ 62.5 ml/ha and foliar spray of nano Zn + Fe @ 250 ml/ha can increase in the plant yield in chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1479 · show in text ↑

iron atom · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: grain · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.