Weed · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)

1. bentazonePositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. pendimethalinResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. ImazethapyrResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. trifluralinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. fomesafenResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. EPTCResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. FluchloralinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. clomazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. fluazifop-P-butylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. flumioxazinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. herbicidePositive and negative results32 papers: 27 positive, 5 negative or no effect
13. mulchingPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. tillagePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. sowing timePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. rotationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. intercroppingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.