- pendimethalinResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ImazethapyrResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- trifluralinResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fomesafenResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- EPTCResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- FluchloralinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- clomazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fluazifop-P-butylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- flumioxazinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.