Trichoderma · Yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)
6 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- White mold intensity on common bean in response to plant density, irrigation frequency, grass mulching, Trichoderma spp., and fungicide (2009)
no changeOne field application of Trichoderma did not increase yield.
Yield of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in ecological production according to environment conservation (2016)increaseTrichoderma-treated bean plots yielded significantly more than controls.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - White mold intensity on common bean in response to plant density, irrigation frequency, grass mulching, Trichoderma spp., and fungicide (2009)
no changeOne field application of Trichoderma did not increase yield.
Context-Dependent Effects of Trichoderma Seed Inoculation on Anthracnose Disease and Seed Yield of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): Ambient Conditions Override Cultivar-Specific Differences (2021)decreaseTrichoderma reduced Flor de Mayo bean yield in anthracnose-free field plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Yield of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in ecological production according to environment conservation (2016)
increaseTrichoderma-treated bean plots yielded significantly more than controls.
Context-Dependent Effects of Trichoderma Seed Inoculation on Anthracnose Disease and Seed Yield of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): Ambient Conditions Override Cultivar-Specific Differences (2021)decreaseTrichoderma reduced Flor de Mayo bean yield in anthracnose-free field plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 3
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.