Pest · Vigna mungo (black gram)

1. thiamethoxamPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Azadirachta indicaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. ImazethapyrPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. carbendazimPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. sulfur atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. imidaclopridResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. SorghumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Zea maysResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. spinosadResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. Beauveria bassianaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Vigna radiata var. radiataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. acetamipridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. emamectin benzoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. endosulfanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. ethyl methanesulfonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. indoxacarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. monocrotophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. nickel atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. botanicalPositive and negative results13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. herbicidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. processingPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. seed treatmentResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.