Pest · Vigna mungo (black gram)

1. imidaclopridResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. SorghumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Zea maysResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. spinosadResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Beauveria bassianaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Vigna radiata var. radiataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. acetamipridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. emamectin benzoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. endosulfanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. ethyl methanesulfonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. indoxacarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. monocrotophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. nickel atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. seed treatmentResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. inoculationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.