density · Yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)

Results agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 claims from these papers.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20052010201520202025
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 5

  1. Effect of spacing on seed yield and physiological traits in moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia) · 2002

  2. Effect of sowing time, row spacing and seed rate on yield and yield attributing characters of moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal] · 2010

  3. Effect of spacing and organics on growth and yield of mothbean genotypes · 2016

  4. Yield and economics of moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal] as influence by the levels of phosphorus, spacing and manures · 2023

  5. Effect of Planting Geometry on Yield and Quality of Moth Bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jacq.) Marechal] Varieties under Arid Conditions · 2026

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

density · yield on other organisms