Paper · 2002 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of spacing on seed yield and physiological traits in moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)

Uday Burman; B. K. Garg; S. Kathju

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during the rainy season of 1997 and 1998 to study the effect of 2 spacings (30 cm x 15 cm and 45 cm x 10 cm) on moth bean [Vigna aconitifolia (Jaeq.) Marcchal] genotypes ('Maru Moth', 'RMO 40' and 'CZM 32E') under rainfed conditions. Closer spacing (30 cm x 15 cm) crop showed higher seed yield (652.5 kg/ha) and dry-matter production (1 812 kg/ha) than 45 cm x 10 cm spacing (seed yield 529 kg/ha and 1 501.5 kg/ha). This was attributed to better utilization of available soil moisture and maintenance of favourable plant water status, which led to high photosynthetic efficiency (17.1 umol/m2/sec) and chlorophyll content (4.50 mg/g dry weight). Genotype 'CZM 32E' showed better seed yield (690 kg/ha), higher photosynthetic rate (17.1 p mol/m2/sec) and favourable plant water status than 'Maru Moth' and 'RMO 40' during both the years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing increased moth bean seed yield to 652.5 kg/ha versus 529 kg/ha.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (30 cm x 15 cm)e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
652.5 kg/hae0
Qualifier
529 kg/hae0
Comparator
45 cm x 10 cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer spacing (30 cm x 15 cm) crop showed higher seed yield (652.5 kg/ha) and dry-matter production (1 812 kg/ha) than 45 cm x 10 cm spacing (seed yield 529 kg/ha and 1 501.5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing increased dry-matter production to 1 812 kg/ha versus 1 501.5 kg/ha.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliat0
Treatment
Closer spacing (30 cm x 15 cm)e0
Outcome
dry-matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Value
1 812 kg/hae0
Qualifier
1 501.5 kg/hae0
Comparator
45 cm x 10 cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Closer spacing (30 cm x 15 cm) crop showed higher seed yield (652.5 kg/ha) and dry-matter production (1 812 kg/ha) than 45 cm x 10 cm spacing (seed yield 529 kg/ha and 1 501.5 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the closer-spacing advantage to better soil moisture use and favourable plant water status.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliat0
Outcome
high photosynthetic efficiencye0
Value
17.1 umol/m2/sece0
Qualifier
better utilization of available soil moisture and maintenance of favourable plant water statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was attributed to better utilization of available soil moisture and maintenance of favourable plant water status, which led to high photosynthetic efficiency (17.1 umol/m2/sec) and chlorophyll content (4.50 mg/g dry weight).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Closer spacing was associated with chlorophyll content of 4.50 mg/g dry weight.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliat0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Value
4.50 mg/g dry weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was attributed to better utilization of available soil moisture and maintenance of favourable plant water status, which led to high photosynthetic efficiency (17.1 umol/m2/sec) and chlorophyll content (4.50 mg/g dry weight).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CZM 32E had better seed yield of 690 kg/ha than Maru Moth and RMO 40.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliat0
Material
'CZM 32E'e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Value
690 kg/hae0
Comparator
'Maru Moth' and 'RMO 40'e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype 'CZM 32E' showed better seed yield (690 kg/ha), higher photosynthetic rate (17.1 p mol/m2/sec) and favourable plant water status than 'Maru Moth' and 'RMO 40' during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CZM 32E had a higher photosynthetic rate of 17.1 p mol/m2/sec than Maru Moth and RMO 40.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliat0
Material
'CZM 32E'e0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.1 p mol/m2/sece0
Comparator
'Maru Moth' and 'RMO 40'e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype 'CZM 32E' showed better seed yield (690 kg/ha), higher photosynthetic rate (17.1 p mol/m2/sec) and favourable plant water status than 'Maru Moth' and 'RMO 40' during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CZM 32E had favourable plant water status relative to Maru Moth and RMO 40.

Taxon
moth beanVigna aconitifoliat0
Material
'CZM 32E'e0
Outcome
plant water statuse0
Direction
favourablee0
Comparator
'Maru Moth' and 'RMO 40'e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna aconitifolia
Vigna aconitifolia · TaxonLalitstar at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype 'CZM 32E' showed better seed yield (690 kg/ha), higher photosynthetic rate (17.1 p mol/m2/sec) and favourable plant water status than 'Maru Moth' and 'RMO 40' during both the years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–90 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Vigna aconitifolia (moth-bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.