Pest · Capsicum (peppers)

47 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. imidaclopridPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. fipronilPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. Allium cepaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. SpinetoramPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. Trichoderma viridePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. novaluronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. spinosadResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. abamectinResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. diafenthiuronResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. emamectin benzoateResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. spiromesifenResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. Beauveria bassianaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. Purpureocillium lilacinumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. cyantraniliproleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. Akanthomyces lecaniiResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. chlorantraniliproleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. chlorfenapyrResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. dicofolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. spirotetramatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. thiamethoxamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. Pasteuria penetransResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. acephateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. acetamipridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. azadirachtinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. buprofezinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. carbarylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. carbendazimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. pyriproxyfenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. triazophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. applicationPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  33. fertilizationPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  34. insecticidePositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  35. intercroppingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  36. botanicalResults agree17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. ipmResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. trap barrierResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  42. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  43. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  44. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  45. radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  46. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  47. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.