Pest · Capsicum (peppers)

47 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. spinosadResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. abamectinResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. diafenthiuronResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. emamectin benzoateResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. spiromesifenResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. Beauveria bassianaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. Purpureocillium lilacinumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. cyantraniliproleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. Akanthomyces lecaniiResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. chlorantraniliproleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. chlorfenapyrResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. dicofolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. spirotetramatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. thiamethoxamResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. Pasteuria penetransResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. acephateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. acetamipridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. azadirachtinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. buprofezinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. carbarylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. carbendazimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. flubendiamideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. pyriproxyfenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. triazophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. botanicalResults agree17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. ipmResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. trap barrierResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  36. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.