- iron atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Bacillus subtilisPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- copper atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- clomazonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitric oxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium chlorideResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- ascorbic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Aspergillus flavusResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- boron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlormequat chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- gelatinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicate(4-)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults differ13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect · 4 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- lightPositive and negative results13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- growing mediumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- in vitroPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- coldResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- processingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- rainfallResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.