- iron atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Bacillus subtilisPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- copper atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- clomazonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitric oxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- growing mediumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- in vitroPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.