Physiology: pigments · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)

50 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. iron atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. Bacillus subtilisPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  3. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. copper atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. clomazonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. nitric oxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. lightPositive and negative results13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  8. inoculationPositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  9. fertilizationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  11. irrigationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. growing mediumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. in vitroPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  16. loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  18. co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.