- Allium sativumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- glucosePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sucrosePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Bacillus subtilisResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus amyloliquefaciensResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- PseudomonasResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- StreptomycesResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Calcium hypochloriteResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ethyl acetateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicate(4-)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 3-aminobutanoic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Allium fistulosumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus pumilusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus thuringiensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Bacillus velezensisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cymbopogon citratusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Glycine maxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Pseudomonas putidaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Syzygium aromaticumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- copper atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fungal metaboliteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lysineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- metaboliteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- serineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thymolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results30 papers: 20 positive, 10 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- loss of functionPositive and negative results19 papers: 6 positive, 13 negative or no effect
- pathogen productPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- transplantingPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- resistance inducerPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- graftingResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- growing mediumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.