botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
49 claims from these papers; 9 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
9 citations between these papers: 7 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 28
- positive
Effect of Allium fistulosum Extract on Ralstonia solanacearum Populations and Tomato Bacterial Wilt · 2011
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Gallotannins Derived from Sedum takesimense on Tomato Bacterial Wilt · 2013
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Antibacterial Activity of Wild Mushroom Extracts on Bacterial Wilt Pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum · 2015
- positive
Effect of Spent Mushroom Substrates of Hericium erinaceum on Plant Pathogens of Tomato · 2015
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of botanicals on Ralstonia solanacearum and bacterial wilt incidence in tomato · 2017
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Management of bacterial wilt of tomato through consortium of biocontrol agents · 2021
- positive
Heritability of tomato rhizobacteria resistant to Ralstonia solanacearum · 2022
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Antagonistic Activity of Ginger Extract and Bacillus Subtilis Against Bacterial Wilt in Tomato · 2025
- positive
- positive
Essential oils for the management of bacterial wilt in tomato plants1 · 2026
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
Evaluation of some botanicals against bacterial wilt of tomatoes · 2011
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.