Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of botanicals on Ralstonia solanacearum and bacterial wilt incidence in tomato

N Kiran Kumar; VB Sanath Kumar; S. O. Manjunatha; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Tomato is considered as the second most important vegetable crop in India and major constraint in its production is bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. The management of the disease is difficult and the chemicals are least effective and are hazardous. Hence, an alternate method of control needs to be developed which is effective, cheap and eco friendly. The water extract from only two botanicals viz., Ocimum gratissimum and Tylophora asthmatica were effective in inhibiting the growth of Ralstonia solanacearum. O. gratissimum extract showed highest inhibition zone of 28.66 mm at 1:0 dilution and had inhibitory effect upto 1:10 dilution with 22.66 mm inhibition zone. Alcohol extract of O. gratissimum was the most effective in inhibiting the growth of R. solanacearum followed by C. gigentea, O. sanctum, T. asthmatica, N. sativa and R. graveolens. Alcohol extract Ocimum gratissimum was found more efficacious than O. sanctum in delaying the onset of wilt disease wherein 100 per cent wilt incidence was observed at 56 DAI.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extracts of Ocimum gratissimum inhibited Ralstonia solanacearum growth.

Treatment
Ocimum gratissimume1
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
growth of Ralstonia solanacearume1
Direction
inhibitinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“water extract from only two botanicals viz., Ocimum gratissimum and Tylophora asthmatica were effective in inhibiting the growth of Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extracts of Tylophora asthmatica inhibited Ralstonia solanacearum growth.

Treatment
Tylophora asthmaticae1
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
growth of Ralstonia solanacearume1
Direction
inhibitinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“water extract from only two botanicals viz., Ocimum gratissimum and Tylophora asthmatica were effective in inhibiting the growth of Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum gratissimum extract produced a 28.66 mm inhibition zone at 1:0 dilution.

Treatment
O. gratissimum extracte1
Outcome
inhibition zonee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
28.66 mme1
Qualifier
1:0 dilutione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum extract showed highest inhibition zone of 28.66 mm at 1:0 dilution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimum gratissimum extract retained a 22.66 mm inhibition zone at 1:10 dilution.

Treatment
O. gratissimum extracte1
Outcome
inhibition zonee1
Direction
inhibitory effecte1
Value
22.66 mme1
Qualifier
1:10 dilutione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“O. gratissimum extract showed highest inhibition zone of 28.66 mm at 1:0 dilution and had inhibitory effect upto 1:10 dilution with 22.66 mm inhibition zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcohol extract of O. gratissimum was most effective against R. solanacearum.

Treatment
Alcohol extract of O. gratissimume1
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
growth of R. solanacearume1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
C. gigentea, O. sanctum, T. asthmatica, N. sativa and R. graveolense1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alcohol extract of O. gratissimum was the most effective in inhibiting the growth of R. solanacearum followed by C. gigentea, O. sanctum, T. asthmatica, N. sativa and R. graveolens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcohol extract of Ocimum gratissimum delayed wilt onset more than O. sanctum, with full incidence at 56 DAI.

Treatment
Alcohol extract Ocimum gratissimume1
Outcome
onset of wilt diseasee1
Direction
delayinge1
Qualifier
100 per cent wilt incidence was observed at 56 DAIe1
Comparator
O. sanctume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alcohol extract Ocimum gratissimum was found more efficacious than O. sanctum in delaying the onset of wilt disease wherein 100 per cent wilt incidence was observed at 56 DAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1043 · show in text ↑

Ocimum gratissimum · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

botanical · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 146 positive, 14 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.