Claim · model-written summary
The tested crude water extracts collectively did not inhibit Ralstonia solanacearum.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- crude extractse0
- Interactor
- Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearume1pathogen - Outcome
- inhibitory effects on Bacteriume0
- Direction
- did not havee0
- Qualifier
- 0.5%, 1% and 10%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The crude extracts at various concentrations (0.5%, 1% and 10%) did not have any inhibitory effects on Bacterium.”
t0“tomatoes”
e1“Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera”
Title
Evaluation of some botanicals against bacterial wilt of tomatoes
Sangoyomi; Owoseni; Omilani International Research Journal of Microbiology 2011
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Water extracts of Zingiber officinale did not inhibit the bacterium at tested concentrations.
- Observation Seven of fourteen antibiotics produced inhibition zones.
- Observation Seven of fourteen antibiotics had no effect on the bacterium.
- Observation The seven named effective antibiotics produced inhibition zones of 2.5-13mm.
- Observation The seven named ineffective antibiotics had no effects on the bacterium.
- Recommendation The authors suggest incorporating effective antibiotics into bacterial wilt management.