Paper · 2011 · International Research Journal of Microbiology

Evaluation of some botanicals against bacterial wilt of tomatoes

Sangoyomi; Owoseni; Omilani

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tomato production is affected majorly by pests and diseases; one of the major diseases being Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera at varying concentrations on Ralstonia solanacearum. The crude extracts at various concentrations (0.5%, 1% and 10%) did not have any inhibitory effects on Bacterium. The use of other types of solvents may be necessary as the active ingredients of the plant materials may not be soluble in water. Sensitivity to antibiotics was tested on the bacterium. Seven of the fourteen antibiotics used showed zones of inhibition while the other seven did not have any effects. Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Pefloxacin, Drovid, Cotrimozazole, Norfloxacin and Clindomycin resulted in varying zoning diameters (2.5-13mm) while Tetracyclin, Amoxycylin, Gentamycin, Nitrofurantoin, Ceftriazone, Augmentin, and Erythromycin did not have effects on the bacterium. The effective antibiotics may be incorporated into the development of an integrated management approach for the control of bacterial wilt of tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water extracts of Zingiber officinale did not inhibit the bacterium at tested concentrations.

Treatment
Zingiber officinalee1
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effects on Bacteriume0
Direction
did not havee0
Qualifier
0.5%, 1% and 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crude extracts at various concentrations (0.5%, 1% and 10%) did not have any inhibitory effects on Bacterium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested crude water extracts collectively did not inhibit Ralstonia solanacearum.

Treatment
crude extractse0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
inhibitory effects on Bacteriume0
Direction
did not havee0
Qualifier
0.5%, 1% and 10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The crude extracts at various concentrations (0.5%, 1% and 10%) did not have any inhibitory effects on Bacterium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven of fourteen antibiotics produced inhibition zones.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
zones of inhibitione0
Value
Seven of the fourteen antibioticse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven of the fourteen antibiotics used showed zones of inhibition while the other seven did not have any effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven of fourteen antibiotics had no effect on the bacterium.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
effectse0
Direction
did not havee0
Value
sevene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seven of the fourteen antibiotics used showed zones of inhibition while the other seven did not have any effects.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seven named effective antibiotics produced inhibition zones of 2.5-13mm.

Treatment
Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Pefloxacin, Drovid, Cotrimozazole, Norfloxacin and Clindomycine0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
zoning diameterse0
Value
2.5-13mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ciprofloxacin, Ofloxacin, Pefloxacin, Drovid, Cotrimozazole, Norfloxacin and Clindomycin resulted in varying zoning diameters (2.5-13mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1144 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The seven named ineffective antibiotics had no effects on the bacterium.

Treatment
Tetracyclin, Amoxycylin, Gentamycin, Nitrofurantoin, Ceftriazone, Augmentin, and Erythromycine0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
effects on the bacteriume0
Direction
did not havee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tetracyclin, Amoxycylin, Gentamycin, Nitrofurantoin, Ceftriazone, Augmentin, and Erythromycin did not have effects on the bacterium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–64 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum. Healthy tomato plants (variety Beske) were subjected to infection with the bacterium to determine its pathogenicity. Studies were also carried out to determine the anti-microbial effects of water extracts of Zingiber officinale, Azadirachta indica, Cymbopogon citratus, Ocimum gratissimum, Allium sativum, Venonia amygdalina, Jatropha curcas, Senna obtusifolia, Senna occidentalis and Senna sophera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–540 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest incorporating effective antibiotics into bacterial wilt management.

Outcome
incorporated into the development of an integrated management approach for the control of bacterial wilte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective antibiotics may be incorporated into the development of an integrated management approach for the control of bacterial wilt of tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1434 · show in text ↑

botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.