Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ethanolic extracts of T. diversifolia gave higher disease severity on tomato leaves than metham sodium, 24% against 16%.

A claim from In vivo antibacterial activity of extracts of Tithonia diversifolia against Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethanolic extracts of T. diversifolia gave higher disease severity on tomato leaves than metham sodium, 24% against 16%.

Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
ethanolic extracts of T. diversifoliae4
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume3pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye4
Direction
higherinferrede4
Value
24 ± 2.6%e4
Comparator
metham sodium (positive control)e5
Setting
greenhouse experimentse4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“This study, therefore, investigated the in vivo antibacterial activity of ethanolic and hexane extracts from Tithonia diversifolia against R. solanacearum in tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–357
e4

“In vivo greenhouse experiments revealed that ethanolic extracts of T. diversifolia gave a percentage disease severity of 24 ± 2.6% in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1106
e5

“32 ± 3.1 % in the flowers as compared to metham sodium (positive control), which gave a disease severity of 16 ± 2.2 % (p ˂ 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1240

Title

In vivo antibacterial activity of extracts of Tithonia diversifolia against Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato

Florence Atieno Opondo; Isaac Odhiambo K'Owino; Sarah Cherono Chepkwony; et al. Scientific African 2023. doi:10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01962

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-39dfe5c0c80b1f16787b33794f29811b74f1c069d842d6798a7ce275d934800c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.