Paper · 2010 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Impacts of livestock waste compost on tomato bacterial wilt,soil enzyme activity and soil microbial functional diversity

Jianwu Wang

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum,is the most important bacterial disease of tomato crops,traditional chemical control is limited because of its efficiency and also it may result in serious negative effects to the environment.Soil amendment with compost has been a viable agronomical practice alternative to suppress disease as well as an attractive waste management strategy.The addition of mature compost to soil improves soil ecological environment and favors plant development,thereby strengthens plant resistance to pathogen,especially for soilborne plant pathogens.Compost amendments therefore maintain and enhance the fertility and productivity of agricultural soils,allowing a sustainable land use.This study investigated impacts of compost soil mixture(CSM)and compost water extract(CWE)on tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum,soil enzyme activity and soil microbial community functional diversity.Results showed that both CWE and CSM strengthened tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum.Compared to the control treatment,application of volume fraction 1∶1 and 1∶3 CWE as well as mass fraction 10% CSM showed a good tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum,decreasing disease index by 69.4%,31.5% and 13.0% respectively 27 days after disease inoculation.The CWE treatment had better tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum than that of the CSM treatment and such a resistance increased with the CWE content.The CSM treatment significantly increased soil urease activity but had no impact on soil sucrase and catalase activities.Compared with the control treatment,the 1∶1 CWE treatment significantly increased soil urease and sucrase activities.Based on the results from BIOLOG analysis for soil microbial community,two kinds of compost treatments significantly reduced the rate of substrate utilization(average well color development,AWCD),with the increase of compost concentration,the lower AWCD value was got.Shannon index and Simpson index of soil microbial community were also decreased after compost application as compared to those of the control treatment.The CMS and CWE treatment had no significant influence on Alatalo evenness.There was a distinct difference in carbon source utilization by soil microorganisms among compost treatments.The main carbon resources used by microbial were carbohydrates and carboxylic acid for the CSM treatment and were carbohydrates and amino acids for the CWE treatment.The classification resulted from principal component analysis(PCA)was accorded with the classification of the tomato resistance to bacterial wilt.This study suggests that livestock waste compost is one of the effective measures to control Ralstonia solanacearum,but the inhibitory effects depend on the treatment patterns and concentrations of compost,and the enhancement of tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum by livestock waste compost is associated with the modification of soil microbial community functional biodiversity and enzyme activity,and as a result,enhance the competition and/or antagonism among microbes,leading to a decrease in plant pathogens activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1∶1 compost treatment reduced tomato disease index by 69.4% after 27 days.

Treatment
1∶1e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
disease indexe1
Direction
decreasinge1
Value
69.4%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of volume fraction 1∶1 and 1∶3 CWE as well as mass fraction 10% CSM showed a good tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreasing disease index by 69.4%,31.5% and 13.0% respectively 27 days after disease inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1∶3 compost treatment reduced tomato disease index by 31.5% after 27 days.

Treatment
1∶3e0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
disease indexe1
Direction
decreasinge1
Value
31.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of volume fraction 1∶1 and 1∶3 CWE as well as mass fraction 10% CSM showed a good tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreasing disease index by 69.4%,31.5% and 13.0% respectively 27 days after disease inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10% CSM compost treatment reduced tomato disease index by 13.0% after 27 days.

Treatment
10% CSMe0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
disease indexe1
Direction
decreasinge1
Value
13.0%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of volume fraction 1∶1 and 1∶3 CWE as well as mass fraction 10% CSM showed a good tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1193 · show in text ↑
e1

“decreasing disease index by 69.4%,31.5% and 13.0% respectively 27 days after disease inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CWE gave better tomato resistance than CSM.

Treatment
CWE treatmente0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearume0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
CSM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The CWE treatment had better tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum than that of the CSM treatment and such a resistance increased with the CWE content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1447 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato resistance increased with CWE content.

Treatment
CWE contente0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The CWE treatment had better tomato resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum than that of the CSM treatment and such a resistance increased with the CWE content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSM significantly increased soil urease activity.

Treatment
CSM treatmente0
Outcome
soil urease activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The CSM treatment significantly increased soil urease activity but had no impact on soil sucrase and catalase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSM had no reported impact on soil sucrase and catalase activities.

Treatment
CSM treatmente0
Outcome
soil sucrase and catalase activitiese0
Direction
no impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The CSM treatment significantly increased soil urease activity but had no impact on soil sucrase and catalase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1∶1 CWE treatment significantly increased soil urease and sucrase activities.

Treatment
1∶1 CWE treatmente0
Outcome
soil urease and sucrase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“the 1∶1 CWE treatment significantly increased soil urease and sucrase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both compost treatments significantly reduced microbial substrate utilization; greater concentration produced lower AWCD.

Treatment
two kinds of compost treatmentse0
Outcome
rate of substrate utilization(average well color development,AWCD)e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“two kinds of compost treatments significantly reduced the rate of substrate utilization(average well color development,AWCD),with the increase of compost concentration,the lower AWCD value was got”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1757–1953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost reduced soil microbial Shannon and Simpson indices versus control.

Treatment
compost applicatione0
Outcome
Shannon index and Simpson index of soil microbial communitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shannon index and Simpson index of soil microbial community were also decreased after compost application as compared to those of the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1954–2105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMS and CWE did not significantly affect microbial Alatalo evenness.

Treatment
CMS and CWE treatmente0
Outcome
Alatalo evennesse0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The CMS and CWE treatment had no significant influence on Alatalo evenness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil microorganism carbon source use differed among compost treatments.

Outcome
carbon source utilization by soil microorganismse0
Direction
distinct differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“There was a distinct difference in carbon source utilization by soil microorganisms among compost treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2181–2289 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSM-associated microbes mainly used carbohydrates and carboxylic acid.

Treatment
CSM treatmente0
Outcome
carbohydrates and carboxylic acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The main carbon resources used by microbial were carbohydrates and carboxylic acid for the CSM treatment and were carbohydrates and amino acids for the CWE treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2290–2455 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CWE-associated microbes mainly used carbohydrates and amino acids.

Treatment
CWE treatmente0
Outcome
carbohydrates and amino acidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The main carbon resources used by microbial were carbohydrates and carboxylic acid for the CSM treatment and were carbohydrates and amino acids for the CWE treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2290–2455 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCA microbial classification corresponded to tomato bacterial wilt resistance classification.

Outcome
classification of the tomato resistance to bacterial wilte0
Comparator
classification resulted from principal component analysis(PCA)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“The classification resulted from principal component analysis(PCA)was accorded with the classification of the tomato resistance to bacterial wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2456–2601 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend livestock waste compost as an effective measure for Ralstonia control.

Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume0pathogen
Outcome
effective measures to control Ralstonia solanacearume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“livestock waste compost is one of the effective measures to control Ralstonia solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2627–2717 · show in text ↑

fertilization · ecology: diversity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

botanical · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

botanical · ecology: diversity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.