Paper · 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaf Extract as a Biocontrol Agent for Managing Bacterial Wilt Disease in Solanaceous Crops

Hadeer Amer Mohan

14
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Ralstonia solanacearum is a soil-borne bacterium that causes bacterial wilt, a devastating disease in affecting vegetable crops world, and necessitating sustainable biological alternatives to conventional chemical pesticides. Objective: This study amid to critically assess both in vitro and in planta efficacy of Eucalyptus camaldulensis (E. camaldulensis) leaf extract against R. solanacearum. Methodology: Ethanolic extracts were made through a process of maceration and profiled in terms of phenolic and flavonoid content. Antibacterial activity was determined by MIC, MBC, synergy by checkerboard, and biofilm inhibition assays and in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings. Results: The extraction yield was 18.5% (w/w), total phenolic (125.3 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid (78.9 mg QE/g) content which mainly comprised gallic acid and quercetin. In vitro tests revealed have shown that the MIC was 0.625 mg/mL and MBC was 1.25 mg/mL. A synergistic effect was observed (FICi=0.5) in combination with streptomycin. Additionally, the extract reduced biofilm formation by up to 90.1% at the MBC. In planta, the Disease Severity Index was significantly reduced in the treated group (85.6% of the infected) to 19.5% at MBC and growth parameters (height and weight) were restored to normal, with no phytotoxicity evident. The extract was also able to disrupt cell membranes of bacteria, as well as inhibit key enzymes, which helped in its bactericidal effect. Conclusion: E. camaldulensis leaf extract is an effective, environmentally-friendly biopesticide with a high potential to manage bacterial wilt and activate crop growth to be used as an integrated pest control approach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus leaf extraction yielded 18.5%.

Taxon
Eucalyptus camaldulensisEucalyptus camaldulensist0
Outcome
extraction yielde0
Value
18.5% (w/w)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Eucalyptus camaldulensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGeekstreet · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extraction yield was 18.5% (w/w)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaf Extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus leaf extract had total phenolic content of 125.3 mg GAE/g.

Taxon
Eucalyptus camaldulensisEucalyptus camaldulensist0
Outcome
total phenolice0
Value
125.3 mg GAE/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Eucalyptus camaldulensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGeekstreet · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolic (125.3 mg GAE/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaf Extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eucalyptus leaf extract had flavonoid content of 78.9 mg QE/g.

Taxon
Eucalyptus camaldulensisEucalyptus camaldulensist0
Outcome
flavonoide0
Value
78.9 mg QE/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Eucalyptus camaldulensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGeekstreet · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flavonoid (78.9 mg QE/g) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaf Extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gallic acid and quercetin were the main constituents of Eucalyptus leaf extract.

Taxon
Eucalyptus camaldulensisEucalyptus camaldulensist0
Outcome
gallic acid and quercetine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Eucalyptus camaldulensis · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryGeekstreet · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content which mainly comprised gallic acid and quercetin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaf Extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract had an MIC of 0.625 mg/mL against Ralstonia solanacearum.

Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
MICe0
Value
0.625 mg/mLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro tests revealed have shown that the MIC was 0.625 mg/mL and MBC was 1.25 mg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“against R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–416 · show in text ↑
e2

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract had an MBC of 1.25 mg/mL against Ralstonia solanacearum.

Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
MBCe0
Value
1.25 mg/mLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro tests revealed have shown that the MIC was 0.625 mg/mL and MBC was 1.25 mg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–960 · show in text ↑
e1

“against R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–416 · show in text ↑
e2

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract combined synergistically with streptomycin, with FICi=0.5.

Treatment
streptomycine0
Outcome
synergistic effecte0
Value
FICi=0.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A synergistic effect was observed (FICi=0.5) in combination with streptomycin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1039 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract reduced bacterial biofilm formation by up to 90.1% at the MBC.

Treatment
the extracte0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
biofilm formatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
90.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the extract reduced biofilm formation by up to 90.1% at the MBC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
e2

“against R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In treated tomato seedlings, the Disease Severity Index fell from 85.6% in infected plants to 19.5% at MBC.

Treatment
treated groupe0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
Disease Severity Indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
19.5%e0
Qualifier
85.6%e0
Comparator
infectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Disease Severity Index was significantly reduced in the treated group (85.6% of the infected) to 19.5% at MBC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1243 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
e2

“against R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract treatment restored tomato height and weight to normal.

Treatment
the treated groupe2
Outcome
growth parameters (height and weight)e0
Direction
restored to normale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth parameters (height and weight) were restored to normal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1309 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
e2

“the treated group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1203 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract showed no evident phytotoxicity in tomato seedlings.

Outcome
no phytotoxicity evidente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no phytotoxicity evident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract disrupted bacterial cell membranes.

Treatment
The extracte0
Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
cell membranes of bacteriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extract was also able to disrupt cell membranes of bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1405 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
e2

“against R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–416 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract inhibited key bacterial enzymes.

Interactor
R. solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume2pathogen
Outcome
key enzymese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as inhibit key enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1437 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑
e2

“against R. solanacearum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–416 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose Eucalyptus leaf extract for integrated bacterial wilt control.

Outcome
manage bacterial wilt and activate crop growth to be used as an integrated pest control approache0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. camaldulensis leaf extract is an effective, environmentally-friendly biopesticide with a high potential to manage bacterial wilt and activate crop growth to be used as an integrated pest control approach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1699 · show in text ↑
e1

“in planta trials were done on tomato seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–705 · show in text ↑

botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.