Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Isabgol seed extract at 1:5 produced 18.00 mm inhibition of Ralstonia growth.

A claim from Management of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum by bacterial antagonists and botanicals · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isabgol seed extract at 1:5 produced 18.00 mm inhibition of Ralstonia growth.

Treatment
Isabgol seed extracte0
Interactor
Ralstonia solanacearumRalstonia solanacearume1pathogen
Outcome
growth of the pathogene0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Value
18.00 mme0
Qualifier
1:5e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ralstonia solanacearum
Ralstonia solanacearum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isabgol seed extract was found to be highly inhibitory to the growth of the pathogen in which inhibition of 22.00, 19.50 and 18.00 mm was observed at 1:0, 1:1 and 1:5 dilutions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–669
e1

“Ralstonia solanacearum a dreaded pathogen causing bacterial wilt of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–193

Title

Management of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum by bacterial antagonists and botanicals

C.R. JAHIR BASHA; C.P. MANJULA; M.K. PRASANNA KUMAR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PLANT SCIENCES 2017. doi:10.15740/has/ijps/12.2/114-119

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e889a982ca7eb82d137f1c6b783a58dd2472638ec69b3409986e9f92c753be6a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

botanical · Ralstonia solanacearum · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 28 positive, 3 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.