Quality: protein · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)

39 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. cadmium atomPositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
  2. sodium chloridePositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  3. calcium atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  4. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. iron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. nitric oxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. tebuconazolePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  8. zinc atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. salicylic acidResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. chitosanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. salinityResults differ14 papers: 1 positive, 13 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  15. fertilizationPositive and negative results16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  16. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  17. co2Positive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  18. botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. heatPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. infectionPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  21. lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. potassiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. processingPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  27. storagePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  28. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. heavy metalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  30. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  31. loss of functionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  32. phPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  33. droughtResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  34. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. radiationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.