salinity · Quality: protein · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
14 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Influence of Exogenously Applied Epibrassinolide and Putrescine on Protein Content, Antioxidant Enzymes and Lipid Peroxidation in Lycopersicon esculentum under Salinity Stress (2012)
increaseSalinity stress slightly increased protein content relative to untreated controls.
EFFECT OF TYLCV AND SALINITY ON GROWTH AND ACTIVITY OF SOME ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES IN TOMATO PLANTS (2012)decreaseSalinity reduced total protein content in tomato.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 13
INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ABSCISIC-ACID-MEDIATED RESPONSES AND PLANT RESISTANCE TO PATHOGENS AND INSECTS · 2004
- negative
Protein Expressing Difference in Salt-tolerant and Salt-sensitive Tomato Under Salt Stress · 2005
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
EFFECT OF TYLCV AND SALINITY ON GROWTH AND ACTIVITY OF SOME ANTIOXIDANT ENZYMES IN TOMATO PLANTS · 2012
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.