application · Control · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)

Results agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 claims from these papers.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19401950196019701980199020002010
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 8

  1. A Control for the Tobacco Flea Beetle (Epitrix Parvula) · 1932

  2. Fungicides for the control of tobacco blue mould in the field · 1964

  3. Control of Tobacco Budworm on Flue-Cured Tobacco with Insecticides Applied Mechanically12 · 1971

  4. A Summary on Tobacco Disease and Insect Prevention and Treatment in Jiahe · 2006

  5. Efficacy of pymetrozine against Myzus persicae and in reducing potato virus Y transmission on tobacco plants · 2009

  6. DRENCH OF SEEDLINGS AS ECOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC FEASIBLE METHOD OF TOBACCO PROTECTION AGAINST WIREWORMS · 2012

  7. Inhibition of fungi polysaccharide on cucumber mosaic virus · 2013

  8. Investigation on Occurrence and Damage of Tobacco Alternaria alternate and Its Fungicide Control Experiments · 2014

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) against other targets

application · control on other organisms