Pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)

1. Allium sativumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. cadmium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. Manihot esculentaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. Meloidogyne arenariaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. Meloidogyne incognitaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. glyphosatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. hydrogen peroxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. aldicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. fumigantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. imidaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. kinetinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. fertilizationPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. loss of functionPositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
19. botanicalPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. infectionPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
22. inoculationPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. transplantingPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. intercroppingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. potassiumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. trap barrierPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. biocontrolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. grazingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. irrigationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
32. nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. transgenicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. insecticideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. pruningResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. rotationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.