Pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)

1. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. aldicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fumigantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. imidaclopridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. kinetinResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. sucroseResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. transgenicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. insecticideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. pruningResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. rotationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.