Quality: phytochemicals · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)

39 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. salicylic acidPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  2. dimethyl sulfoxidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. Sesamum indicumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. selenium atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. malic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  8. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  9. oleic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. phenylalanineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. fertilizationPositive and negative results38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  13. nitrogenPositive and negative results17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  14. potassiumPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  15. densityPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  16. overexpressionPositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  17. pruningPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. graftingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. rotationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. shadePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. inoculationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. uvResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. classResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. humidityResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. in vitroResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. loss of functionResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  33. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. processingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. radiationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  39. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.