Quality: phytochemicals · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)

1. Sesamum indicumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. selenium atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. malic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. oleic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. phenylalanineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. inoculationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. nanoparticleResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. uvResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. classResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. humidityResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. in vitroResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. loss of functionResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
19. otherResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. processingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. radiationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.