Quality: phytochemicals · Solanum tuberosum (potato)

37 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. sucroseResults differ2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  2. magnesium atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  3. (-)-methyl jasmonatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. L-cysteinePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. PseudomonasResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. potassium chlorideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  9. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. droughtResults differ6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  11. radiationResults differ6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  12. fertilizationPositive and negative results19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  13. storagePositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  14. processingPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  15. potassiumPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  16. botanicalPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  17. nitrogenPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. cultivation systemPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  19. coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  20. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. lightPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  25. phPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. otherResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. mechanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. physical treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. insecticideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  36. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. uvResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.