Verticillium dahliae · Olea europaea (common olive)

1. copper atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Ceratonia siliquaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Punica granatumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
5. applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. fertilizationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.