Verticillium dahliae · Olea europaea (common olive)

1. copper atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. Ceratonia siliquaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Punica granatumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. irrigationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.