botanical · Growth · Carthamus tinctorius (safflower)

Positive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect20082010201220142016201820202022
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 2

  1. Leaf powder of Melia azedarach L., Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev and Tagetes erecta L. for seed treatment of Carthamus tinctorius L. · 2019

  2. Foliar application of moringa leaf extract (MLE) enhanced antioxidant system, growth, and biomass related attributes in safflower plants · 2022

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3

  1. Allelopathic effects of Chenopodium album, Amaranthus retroflexus and Cynodon dactylon on germination and growth of safflower · 2008

  2. Allelopathic Effect of Lemon Balm on Germination and Growth of Pea, Safflower and Wheat · 2012

  3. Influence of Ilex paraguariensis aqueous extract on safflower growth and germination in vitro · 2016

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

botanical on Carthamus tinctorius (safflower) against other targets

botanical · growth on other organisms