- cadmium atomResults differ3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- silicon atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chromium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- imazamoxResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- lead atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- droughtResults differ7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect · 4 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
- co2Positive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- potassiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- heavy metalResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- uvResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- phosphorusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.