- mannitolPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silver nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pollinationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- in vitroResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- coldResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- physical treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.