Quality: phytochemicals · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)

1. 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. silver nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. in vitroResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. coldResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. physical treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.