calcium atom · Growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)
6 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Metabolomics analysis reveals the responses of tea plants to excessive calcium (2021)
increaseExcess calcium improved tea root growth at low pH.
Aluminum Supplementation Mediates the Changes in Tea Plant Growth and Metabolism in Response to Calcium Stress (2023)decreaseCalcium stress caused severe growth inhibition in tea plants
What separates themSituation: toxic level · not statedCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 0 on the same side, 1 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 1
Metabolomics analysis reveals the responses of tea plants to excessive calcium · 2021
- positive
- no effect
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 3
- negative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.