(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · Yield · Avena sativa (oats)
7 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 2
2 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Oat and Rye Tolerance to Mesosulfuron and Tribenuron (2007)
no changeMCPA did not affect grain yield of oat and rye.
Competition between skeleton weed ( Chondrila juncea L) and cereals in relation to nitrogen supply (1958)increaseOne MCPA application in the fallow or after crop emergence increased oat yield from 710 to 1350 lb grain per acre
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Oat and Rye Tolerance to Mesosulfuron and Tribenuron (2007)
no changeMCPA did not affect grain yield of oat and rye.
THE INFLUENCE OF IRRIGATION, FERTILIZING AND MCPA ON THE COMPETITION BETWEEN SPRING CEREALS AND WEEDS (1962)increaseMCPA significantly increased oat grain yield on some fertilized, irrigated plots.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 5
Competition between skeleton weed ( Chondrila juncea L) and cereals in relation to nitrogen supply · 1958
- positive
- positive
Oat Response to Manganese and Zinc1 · 1976
- positive
Naked oat response to soil type and herbicides applied at two growing stages · 2010
- positive
Response of Oat and Broadleaf Weeds to Postemergence Herbicides · 2011
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
Oat and Rye Tolerance to Mesosulfuron and Tribenuron · 2007
- no effect
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.