Abstract
Spring seeded oat (Avena sativa L.) is a multi-use crop in the north-central Great Plains states. However, little efficacy and crop safety data are available on postemergence broadleaf herbicides labeled for use in oat. The objectives of this research were to evaluate broadleaf weed control and potential for crop injury using postemergence herbicides labeled for use in oat. Field experiments were conducted in Minnesota in 2007 and 2008. Pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil was the only herbicide that resulted in oat injury (P = 0.01). All treatments resulted in: excellent visual control of velvetleaf (99%); excellent to good control of redroot pigweed (> 82%), except MCPA amine (58%); excellent to good control of common lambsquarter (> 89%); excellent to good control of wild mustard (> 82%), except dicamba (75%); and excellent to good control of wild buckwheat (> 80%), except MCPA amine; and fluroxypyr + 2,4-D which resulted in poor control (< 79%). When averaged across locations and years, florasulam + MCPA was the only treatment that resulted in a greater net economic return (NET) compared to the control (P < 0.01). This study provides farmers and consultants with ‘Kame’ oat safety, weed efficacy, and net economic return for twelve commonly used postemergent broadleaf herbicides or mixtures labeled for oat.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil was the only herbicide causing oat injury.
- Taxon
- oat
Avena sativae0 - Treatment
- Pyrasulfotole + bromoxynile0
- Outcome
- oat injurye0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil was the only herbicide that resulted in oat injury (P = 0.01).”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments controlled velvetleaf at 99%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- All treatmentse0
- Interactor
- velvetleaf
Abutilon theophrastie0weed - Outcome
- control of velvetleafe0
- Direction
- excellente0
- Value
- 99%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All treatments resulted in: excellent visual control of velvetleaf (99%);”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Most treatments controlled redroot pigweed above 82%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Interactor
- redroot pigweede0weed
- Outcome
- control of redroot pigweede0
- Direction
- excellent to goode0
- Value
- > 82%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“excellent to good control of redroot pigweed (> 82%), except MCPA amine (58%);”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
MCPA amine controlled redroot pigweed at 58%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- MCPA aminee0
- Interactor
- redroot pigweede0weed
- Outcome
- control of redroot pigweede0
- Value
- 58%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“control of redroot pigweed (> 82%), except MCPA amine (58%);”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments controlled common lambsquarter above 89%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Interactor
- common lambsquartere0weed
- Outcome
- control of common lambsquartere0
- Direction
- excellent to goode0
- Value
- > 89%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“excellent to good control of common lambsquarter (> 89%);”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Most treatments controlled wild mustard above 82%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Interactor
- wild mustarde0weed
- Outcome
- control of wild mustarde0
- Direction
- excellent to goode0
- Value
- > 82%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“excellent to good control of wild mustard (> 82%), except dicamba (75%);”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Dicamba controlled wild mustard at 75%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- dicambae0
- Interactor
- wild mustarde0weed
- Outcome
- control of wild mustarde0
- Value
- 75%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“control of wild mustard (> 82%), except dicamba (75%);”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Most treatments controlled wild buckwheat above 80%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Interactor
- wild buckwheat
Fallopia convolvuluse0weed - Outcome
- control of wild buckwheate0
- Direction
- excellent to goode0
- Value
- > 80%e0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“excellent to good control of wild buckwheat (> 80%), except MCPA amine; and fluroxypyr + 2,4-D which resulted in poor control (< 79%).”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluroxypyr + 2,4-D produced poor wild buckwheat control below 79%.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- fluroxypyr + 2,4-De0
- Interactor
- wild buckwheatFallopia convolvuluse0weed
- Outcome
- control of wild buckwheate0
- Direction
- poore0
- Value
- < 79%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“excellent to good control of wild buckwheat (> 80%), except MCPA amine; and fluroxypyr + 2,4-D which resulted in poor control (< 79%).”
t0“Oat”
Claim · model-written summary
Florasulam + MCPA produced greater net economic return than the control.
- Taxon
- OatAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- florasulam + MCPAe0
- Outcome
- net economic return (NET)e0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“florasulam + MCPA was the only treatment that resulted in a greater net economic return (NET) compared to the control (P < 0.01).”
t0“Oat”
The same questions in other papers
(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →dicamba · control · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · control · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · crop injury · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.