sowing time · Quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)
13 claims from these papers; 3 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
3 citations between these papers: 1 on the same side, 2 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 5
- positive
- positive
- negative
- positive
- positive
Yield and quality of spring cereals depending on cultivation conditions · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 5
- negative
The Variation of β-glucan and Protein Content in Barley as Affected by Agronomic Practices · 2002
- negative
Barley response to seeding date in central Alberta · 2003
- no effect
Effects of Sowing Date on Protein and its Components Contents in Barley Grain · 2010
- no effect
Effect of seeding date and seeding rate on malting barley production in western Canada · 2012
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.